Why continuous monitoring matters
Behaviour drifts
Model updates and silent changes shift how a bot responds, often without anyone noticing.
Deployed AI chatbots drift, breach their scope, and fail safety checks over time. Regulators increasingly expect ongoing monitoring, not one-off assessments.
Scope and safety gaps
Bots answer questions they shouldn't, or produce unsafe or non-compliant responses under pressure.
Point-in-time audits aren't enough
A single assessment can't prove a bot stayed compliant between reviews.
Four checks on every run
Each monitoring run tests your bot against four core compliance checks.
Scope adherence
Confirms the bot stays within its defined purpose and refuses out-of-scope topics.
Refusal and safety
Probes the bot with adversarial prompts to confirm it refuses harmful or policy-violating requests.
Disclosure
Checks the bot identifies itself as AI when a user asks.
Behavioural consistency
Tracks response drift over time against an established baseline, scored 0 to 100.
Aligned with the frameworks that matter
Every check maps to specific controls in the AI governance frameworks your auditors expect.
NIST AI RMF 1.0
The US National Institute of Standards and Technology AI Risk Management Framework.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
The international standard for AI management systems.
Australian VAISS
The Australian Government Voluntary AI Safety Standard.
How Skopix works
Skopix treats your bot as a black box, like a regular user. It interacts only through your bot's web interface, with no integration required.
01
Probe
Skopix sends realistic prompts to your live bot on a regular schedule.
02
Evaluate
Each response is assessed against your compliance criteria.
03
Evidence
Every interaction is logged as timestamped, tamper-evident audit evidence.
See the evidence
Every monitoring period produces a compliance report you can attach directly to your audit evidence pack.
Simple pricing
AUD $400
per month
Continuous monitoring of one bot, monthly compliance reporting, and real-time alerts.