Framework Compliance Assessment
Structured compliance assessments against the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and VAISS — Australia's AI guardrails. Most organisations don't know their AI governance gaps until an auditor, regulator, or customer questionnaire finds them first. Our assessments give you a structured, actionable, evidence-based view of where you stand against two leading frameworks.
Frameworks covered

NIST AI RMF Assessment
-
What it is: Assessment against all 72 subcategories across the four NIST AI RMF functions — Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage.
-
Who it's for: Organisations needing a comprehensive, internationally recognised governance baseline, including for cross-border contracts and customer due diligence.
-
Output: Function-level and subcategory-level compliance scoring, detailed observations, gap register, suggested actions.
.png)
VAISS Assessment
-
What it is: Assessment against Australia's Voluntary AI Safety Standard (10 guardrails).
-
Who it's for: Organisations deploying AI in or for the Australian market, or benchmarking against AU practice.
-
Output: Compliance score per guardrail, supporting evidence, gap list, prioritised recommendations.
How it works
What you get
A structured report containing: overall and per-category compliance score, detailed observations against each requirement, identified gaps, and prioritised next steps — written for management decision-making, not just auditors.
