top of page

Framework Compliance Assessment

Structured compliance assessments against the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and VAISS — Australia's AI guardrails. Most organisations don't know their AI governance gaps until an auditor, regulator, or customer questionnaire finds them first. Our assessments give you a structured, actionable, evidence-based view of where you stand against two leading frameworks.

Frameworks covered

NIST AI RMF

NIST AI RMF Assessment

  • What it is: Assessment against all 72 subcategories across the four NIST AI RMF functions — Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage.

  • Who it's for: Organisations needing a comprehensive, internationally recognised governance baseline, including for cross-border contracts and customer due diligence.

  • Output: Function-level and subcategory-level compliance scoring, detailed observations, gap register, suggested actions.

Australian VAISS

VAISS Assessment

  • What it is: Assessment against Australia's Voluntary AI Safety Standard (10 guardrails).

  • Who it's for: Organisations deploying AI in or for the Australian market, or benchmarking against AU practice.

  • Output: Compliance score per guardrail, supporting evidence, gap list, prioritised recommendations.

How it works

  1. Intake: Scope confirmation, system/use-case inventory.

  2. Structured data collection: Guided evidence gathering against the framework.

  3. Scoring: Every requirement assessed and every category scored.

  4. Report delivery: Summary score, detailed findings, gaps, recommended actions.

What you get

A structured report containing: overall and per-category compliance score, detailed observations against each requirement, identified gaps, and prioritised next steps — written for management decision-making, not just auditors.

Interested? Get in touch.

bottom of page